Lush reviews

3.7

58% would recommend to a friend

(2,209 total reviews)
avatar

Mark Constantine

54% approve of CEO

36% positive business outlook

Lush has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 2,209 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Lush employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Commerce de détail et de gros industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Jul 8, 2023

Do not work at this company.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are a few people in this company who are absolute gems, they truly care about the business and about its ethics and will always try to help when they can. Lush also do a lot of genuine charity work that doesn't get talked about enough, particularly the annual Spring Prize, which gives money to fund alternatives to animal testing. 50% discount.

Cons

There are so many things wrong with Lush it's difficult to know where to start. There is a complete lack of management within the Digital business, and what management there is tends to be friends of the CEO's son, who know nothing about Lush, nothing about modern digital business, and do not care about anything beyond lining their own pockets and giving each other pats on the back. The leadership within Digital is basically one big tech bro nightmare, where one unqualified person will come up with a ludicrous idea to waste half a million. This idea will be partially construct by one of the R&D guys, afterwhich it will go out untested, unvetted, and without supporting documentation. Due to pressure from leadership these projects will often go live without any knowledge of what this means for customers, or the teams who will have to support the product going forward. Digital leadership do not care about digital ethics. There is a lot if talk, a lot of headlines, but when it comes down to the nitty-gritty of applying digital ethics, leadership do not want to know. They do not want to spend the money or the time to implement good digital ethical practices. They want to make money and make headlines, and that's it. They do not care. There is no process for escalating issues or complaints. There is no management structure. It is impossible to make a positive change due to every complaint eventually ending up on the desk of the CEO's son, against whom you cannot speak a negative word. The work environment is demoralising. Deadlines are set without any knowledge of what work actually needs to be carried out, with crunch culture being the only way to reach these deadlines. Services are turned off without any proper planning, leading to complete chaos across the business. Other services are left to rot, creating an infrastructure that is one failure away from complete collapse at all times. In general Lush also refuse to deal with interpersonnel issues, often leaving store staff to fend for themselves. There is also a clique culture in every area of the business, if you aren't in with the right people you will not have a good time at Lush. There is also bullying and discrimination in the highest levels of the business. As a result Lush is not a safe space. The pay at Lush is at times 50% that of the market average for similar roles. Bonuses were stopped in 2019 without any real explanation and have never fully returned, however, the CEO's son and his mates are allowed to spend more than half a million on a jolly to Texas. Employees are expected to work themselves into the ground for zero bonus, low wages, no accountability, no management, and no other benefits. Lush also has a toxic "we're a family" ethos. Lush is not a family, unless you are one of the CEO's family members, or a close friend, you are just a pleb to make them money. I have watched bad management run this company into the ground over the last ten years. It's sad what they have done to Lush. Do not work at this company.

1.0
Apr 29, 2024

Greedy Directors, Underpaid Staff. Not ethical to employees!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Staff discount Diversity encouraged Free tea and coffee

Cons

Despite the company making a loss and refusing to pay its support staff a bonus (let alone give them a fair salary for their role) the directors will happily pay themselves a £1million + bonus each. For a company that claims to spearhead ethics it's shocking how badly it treats it's staff, refusing to meet market rate salary and underpaying mid level roles massively. A bullying culture is known about by the people team but buried under the carpet so senior staff are protected. A toxic culture which serves only those at the top, leaving others the only choice to turn a blind eye or leave. This sadly leaves an environment led by the nepotistic leaders and their friends who will continue to be out for their own gain and profit.

1.0
Feb 28, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Technical team were some of the kindest, smartest people I've worked with

Cons

Severe disconnect between non technical and technical roles created an "us vs them" environment. Overly sensitive team members would not approach grievences professionally but would discuss other team members without their involvement. Most information is passed around on a hearsay basis. All feature related discussions are unnecessarily held on a "Need to know" basis, technical teams would have zero input on scope, time or complexity and would be given work once it's all decided by non technical stakeholders with strict unfeasable deadlines. You will find more transparency staring at a brick wall. The business' approach to communication and transparency can be closely attributed to their response to the recent staff data hack, where the entire HR system was breached. It been kept as close to the chest as possible, with ex employees informed reactively after a number of complaints to the ICO, with radio silence since, despite the ICO recommendation that ALL data subjects be updated as soon as possible and kept informed of any updates on the matter. The codebase is horrendous, an abundance of legacy code with no real standards followed. Due to deadlines most work would be completed to "get it done" rather than consider the wider implications. This lead to a lot of stacking and bolt-ons to an already unsteady and unscaleable foundation. The entire codebase is needlessly complex for a retail site. There are a number of team members with decades of experience in various technical industries who's legitimate concerns or suggestions are completely ignored in favour of a small team of "Tech warriors", Lush's name for their technical R&D team. Projects would start with the TW who will discover a solution to a problem, then without consideration of standards or scaleability that project would be passed down to the technical teams with no room for feedback or improvement. You would be expected to get straight to work on features. I will stress that the state of the codebase is not the fault of the current developers. The pressure on them is immense and this is the product and consequence of years of severe negligence from non technical stakeholders towards the technical teams. They can only play the hand they are dealt in the situation they've been put in. Though the technical teams try, there is no real team composition or feeling part of a team. Developers could be plucked from one project to another at a moments notice with no notification to the team or structure to speak of. Overall you don't feel like you're working as part of a team with a unified goal and it can be a very isolating experience. You feel as though you are sitting in a pool of developers waiting to be called to fulfil someone elses decisions, yet will take the fall should it fail or deadlines not be met. There will be days where you will be given no work at all and any requests will be met with an "I'll get back to you" that never arrives. Other days you will be given an untenable task with a strict deadline and heavy micromanagement. If you're looking to develop your skills as a junior or provide your expertise as a senior, this place isn't for you. Due to the way things work at Lush or "The Lush way" as they call it, you will not learn good standard. You will not learn best practise and it would be a backwards step in your own personal development. The most you will learn will be other devs trying to teach you good practise in an environment where you are physically unable to put it to use. If you're a seasoned developer, your workload will be quadrupled yet your expertise, no matter how broad or seasoned, will be completely ignored. Yet the expectation from the business will be on you to solve all their problems with zero ownership or power to be able to make the necessary changes that are required to pluck out the roots of their issues. If your approach to work is to clock in at 9, leave at 5 and just do what's needed of you at the bare minimum, you might consider the role here and that's fine, each to their own. However don't come to this role expecting a healthy environment if you're looking to have your voice heard. You'll only be disappointed. I ignored the warnings of previous reviews given the dates they were posted with the expectation that the passing time had improved the process. It is still the same, and I'm posting what I remember of my experience to warn anyone who reads this as well. Do not work for this company.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 2,209 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,752 Lush reviews submitted anonymously by Lush employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lush is right for you.