good for career growth and onsite opportunities, but low pay and more work - Programme Analyst Infosys Employee Review

4.0
Jun 11, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Intensive fresher training, rapid career growth, onsite opportunities, fair treatment, lack of politics, awards and recognition, opportunity for improvement if you lack in some areas, challaning opportunities.

Cons

workaholic community, prefers quantity of employees not quality, lower pay compared to MNCs, one will lose interest in technology since project managment takes precedence as he grows in job ladder rapidly

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
Feb 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

lot of learning opportunities for career growth

Cons

location contraints and we were not able to find many projects

4.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All