Austin Prospective Employees Beware! - People Manager Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
Jul 7, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The non-leadership people ("worker-bees") hired in Austin are good, skilled people. I enjoyed working with them and enjoyed having them work for me. There are a few good leaders, but they keep their head down in fear of losing their employment.

Cons

Capgemini in Austin, baits people with higher than average salaries and misleads about the positions being filled. They then demand that employees meet impossible, contractual, deliverables. This requires working 80 hours a week on a regular basis. Because most employees are exempt salaried employees, there are virtually no labor laws to protect them from being overworked. The leadership uses fear and demoralization as motivational tools, verbally "whipping" people that miss due dates. The stress level of the Austin office is off the charts. 3 people have been sent to the hospital in the past year, due to the stress and unrelenting pressure. As if the commute was not bad enough (the office is in downtown Austin), the office conditions are dismal. Everyone gets a 3x5 table to work from. No privacy and no personalization. Feels very much like a sweatshop. The leadership team are clock watchers and there is no work-life balance. Any manager that tries to address the conditions for their employees, gets shunned and shot down quickly by senior staff, being labeled as a "weak manager".

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All