From Private Sector to Public Sector - Consultant CGI Employee Review

5.0
Feb 13, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Stable company for a consulting firm. Because it is publicly traded does not have the up or out philosophy of consulting partnership. Working for federal clients also allows for great hours. basically 9-5 on most projects. Most projects are long-term engagements typically lasting 1+ years. It is not all body shop - augmentation work as i have been involved in a couple of strategic short-term projects over my short stint here. But Most work is implementation/outsourcing IT work. I find most people at this company are more humble and less competitive(negative competition that leads to backstabbing)than at my previous employer.(Deloitte Consulting) and the company has a more flexible culture than my other previous employer.(IBM Consulting).

Cons

I come from a private sector consulting background so i find the hours that i have experienced so far at CGI to be rather pleasant. After working for companies who along with the client expected 60+ hour work weeks plush travel, it is rather refreshing working for a company where 40 hour work weeks is the norm. The low margins involved with government work are also reflected in the lower pay as compared to our private sector counterparts. But it is a personal decision to take less money for a better work-life balance. It's a decision that i decided to make and i'm quite happy with.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Apr 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great leadership Understanding of work/life balance

Cons

Don't really have any cons for this company

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All