Chaos - Senior Consultant CGI Employee Review

1.0
Mar 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work, that's about it

Cons

Working on 20+ year old government projects that have been passed from consultancy to consultancy over that period creating an tangled mess of code that everyone's scared to touch because 'it works' and nobody really understands how. Working with people just randomly chosen to be on a project as they are available but have zero knowledge of the tech used by the project and are expected to make sound decisions regarding the applications in short periods of time. You don't feel like you're part of a team, just a bunch of people quickly put together to execute a task, if you're lucky some will know what they're doing. Management is non existent because they're constantly trying to hire more people to work on projects they ignore people who actually work there, no feedback or assistance on what to do, questions blatantly ignored. Heavy reliance on AI tools to do work meaning you're not actually using any of your skills. If you're desperate go for it, you'll most likely get the job as they are too.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
May 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A great environment of people

Cons

No major cons while employed

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All